OpenAI Targets $600B Compute Spend and $280B Revenue by 2030

OpenAI’s latest financial projections represent a pivotal moment in the history of Silicon Valley, framing the pursuit of Artificial General Intelligence (AGI) as the most capital-intensive endeavor in corporate history. By tempering its compute spending target to $600 billion while simultaneously projecting a massive $280 billion in revenue by 2030, the company is signaling both the immense scale of its ambitions and a newfound focus on fiscal discipline as it approaches a mega funding round. This strategic pivot reflects the reality of the AI arms race: while the potential rewards are astronomical, the infrastructure costs—ranging from specialized silicon to massive power grids—are beginning to test the limits of even the most well-capitalized private entities.

The $600 billion compute target, while described as tempered, remains a figure without precedent in the technology sector. To put this in perspective, it exceeds the total market capitalization of most Fortune 500 companies. This spending is not merely for hardware acquisition but encompasses the entire lifecycle of frontier model development, including the construction of massive data centers and the procurement of renewable energy sources to power them. The decision to temper this target suggests that OpenAI may be finding ways to optimize model training efficiency or is perhaps acknowledging the physical constraints of the global supply chain for GPUs and power infrastructure. It also serves as a signal to investors that the company is mindful of its burn rate as it seeks to transition from a research-heavy lab to a commercial powerhouse.

“

Microsoft, as OpenAI’s largest investor and cloud provider, stands to benefit directly from this $600 billion spend, as much of it will likely flow back into Azure infrastructure.

On the revenue side, the $280 billion projection for 2030 is equally audacious. For context, this would place OpenAI in the same revenue tier as current tech titans like Apple or Microsoft. Achieving this would require OpenAI to move beyond being a provider of sophisticated chatbots and become the foundational operating system for the global economy. This likely involves a massive expansion of its enterprise services, the successful rollout of autonomous AI agents capable of performing complex labor, and perhaps a significant share of the global software-as-a-service (SaaS) market. The proximity of a mega funding round suggests that OpenAI needs this narrative of massive future returns to justify the multi-hundred-billion-dollar valuation it is reportedly seeking from private investors.

The implications for OpenAI’s primary partners and competitors, such as Microsoft and Amazon, are profound. Microsoft, as OpenAI’s largest investor and cloud provider, stands to benefit directly from this $600 billion spend, as much of it will likely flow back into Azure infrastructure. However, the sheer scale of OpenAI’s ambitions may eventually create friction if the company seeks to build its own independent infrastructure or silicon. Meanwhile, Amazon, through its AWS division and investments in Anthropic, is locked in a high-stakes competition to provide the alternative stack for the AI era. The $280 billion revenue target suggests OpenAI intends to capture value that currently belongs to traditional cloud and software providers, potentially disrupting the very ecosystems that currently support it.

Looking forward, the success of this roadmap depends on OpenAI’s ability to maintain its lead in model performance while navigating increasingly complex regulatory and geopolitical landscapes. The upcoming funding round will be a critical litmus test for investor appetite for high-risk, high-reward AI bets in an environment where the AI bubble narrative is frequently debated. If OpenAI can secure the necessary capital and hit its efficiency targets, it may well become the first company to spend its way to AGI, fundamentally reshaping the global economic order in the process. The next 24 months will be decisive as the company attempts to bridge the gap between its current research-led identity and the commercial titan it aspires to be by the end of the decade.