The clearest coverage concentration is regulation: 2 of 3 stories, with the rest divided among 1 other category. The Guardian is most often covered alongside AI, which appears in 1 of these 3 stories. That works out to roughly 0.1 stories per week across a 195-day span.
Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record
— see our methodology for how impact and
sentiment are derived.
What the coverage shows about The Guardian
The clearest coverage concentration is regulation: 2 of 3 stories, with the rest divided among 1 other category. The Guardian is most often covered alongside AI, which appears in 1 of these 3 stories. That works out to roughly 0.1 stories per week across a 195-day span. Their average consequence score of 6.7 runs above the beat's 6.5 for that window. Each story carries 2.3 original sources on average, compared with 2.8 for the broader beat in this window. The Guardian appears in 3 tracked AI stories published from February 18, 2026 through August 31, 2026.
Stories tracked
3
Per week
0.1
Sources per story
2.3
Computed from the 3 stories linked to this entity, with beat comparisons drawn from all 2245 AI stories published in the same date window. Shares are omitted below five stories and comparisons below a twenty-story baseline.
Coverage cohort
Appears alongside
Other entities that clear the same relevance threshold in stories also covering The Guardian. Shared-story counts are live from our verified record — not editorial picks.
The UK AISI's Loss of Control Observatory recorded more than 300 real-world AI loss-of-control incidents in July 2026, nearly double June. For AI practitioners, this shifts safety concerns from benchmark failures to live deployment failures, led by developer-facing bots.
As AI integration accelerates across industries, the promised 'leisure dividend' of a four-day workweek is being exposed as a mirage. Instead of reducing hours, AI tools are frequently driving increased workload expectations and heightening worker anxiety over job security and algorithmic surveillance.
A new report challenges the narrative from Google and Microsoft that artificial intelligence is a primary tool for solving the climate crisis, labeling such claims as 'greenwashing.' While these tech giants promote AI's potential for environmental optimization, their own carbon footprints have surged significantly due to the massive energy requirements of training and running large-scale models.
The Guardian is linked from 3 stories on this site, each scored at or above our 35% relevance threshold — see how these pages are built.
See something wrong on this page — a misattributed entity, a wrong stat, a broken source
link? Report a data issue.