ai-research is the sole category represented across all 1 tracked stories. ChatGPT is the most frequent co-covered peer, appearing in 1 of the 1 tracked story. They are less corroborated than the beat average, carrying 2 original sources each against 2.3 for the same window.
Figures are computed live from our source-verified story record
— see our methodology for how impact and
sentiment are derived.
What the coverage shows about Judgment and Decision Making
ai-research is the sole category represented across all 1 tracked stories. ChatGPT is the most frequent co-covered peer, appearing in 1 of the 1 tracked story. They are less corroborated than the beat average, carrying 2 original sources each against 2.3 for the same window. Their average consequence score of 5 runs below the beat's 5.8 for that window. Judgment and Decision Making appears in 1 tracked AI story from August 5, 2026.
Stories tracked
1
Sources per story
2
Computed from the 1 stories linked to this entity, with beat comparisons drawn from all 29 AI stories published in the same date window. Shares are omitted below five stories and comparisons below a twenty-story baseline.
Coverage cohort
Appears alongside
Other entities that clear the same relevance threshold in stories also covering Judgment and Decision Making. Shared-story counts are live from our verified record — not editorial picks.
In a rigorous experiment, 1,682 subjects not only couldn't distinguish AI-generated fiction from human-written stories but also consistently preferred the AI versions. The findings, published in Judgment and Decision Making, signal a leap in AI's creative capability.